Ahhh, Mississippi, you've got a law that's essentially threatening to shut down the one clinic providing abortions to women in the state. (read the story here) Well done with your attempts to push your uber-conservative beliefs on others. This means that any poor (which is the majority of your state) or working woman would suffer an undue burden (see O'Connor's language in her dissent in Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Rights, 462 US 416 (1983), in her concurring in Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 (1973), and in the plurality in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 US 833 (1992)) when seeking such medical care. Thank goodness the remaining clinic is going to fight this new law. I pray (yes, I, a person supporting a woman's right to choose appropriate medical care for herself, pray and do so on a very regular basis) that the clinic is successful and can continue protecting women's health in Mississippi. I'll be honest, you're kind of the state that scrapes the bottom of the barrel . . . maybe it's time you try a new approach to governing and life.
This blog is mainly focused on current legal stories and cases. Because I am licensed in Ohio and Tennessee and living in Oklahoma, I tend to read (and therefore blog) mostly about cases from those states. When I get tired of reading about legal cases, I blog about my dogs and other interesting stories. I try to keep the author as my dog Ella, but I'm not very successful at that. Goal for future: Be more persuasive about Ella being the author despite me being the one who can type.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Trouble in Mississippi for Women Needing Healthcare
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment